In his book, Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience, Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi notes that Aristotle observed 2300 years ago that more than anything men and women seek happiness. In this book, Csikszentmihalyi (psychology, Univ. of Chicago) examines flow and describes it in terms of the connections between satisfaction and daily activities. He defines a flow state as one that ensues when one is engaged in self-controlled, goal-related, meaningful actions and it is often described by the person experiencing it as the sense of complete, purposeful, satisfaction that is generally recognized as happiness.
What I thought was really cool was how much he talks about food and happiness. Our need for food is pretty basic. If you want to survive, you have to eat, but to simply surviving does not make us happy. In fact, for those of us that battle weight, food ultimately makes us unhappy. So, the question is, how can food make us happy? Can food produce flow? I think it can.
To begin, I think it is important that we come to some basic understanding of meaning of pleasure and enjoyment. I'm going to ask you to set aside your personal definitions of these words so that we can all speak the same language.
For our purposes, pleasure can be described as a situation in which we do something that fills a basic physiological or psychological need. When this happens, a little pulse of electricity goes to one of a few "pleasure centers" of the brain. When that happens, you feel pleasure. When the electrical impulse stops, however, it's over. While pleasure is powerful, it's temporary.
Enjoyment, on the other hand, is not directly tied to an external stimulus. Enjoyment is more closely tied to accomplishment and true satisfaction. Enjoyment hangs around to serve us breakfast in bed while pleasure leaves as soon as . . . well, you get the idea.
To quote the book,
"Enjoyment is characterized by this forward movement: by a sense of novelty, of accomplishment. Playing a close game of tennis that stretches one's ability is enjoyable, as is reading a book that reveals things in a new light, as is having a conversation that leads us to express ideas we didn't know we had. Closing a contested business deal, or any piece of work well done, is enjoyable. None of these experiences may be particularly pleasurable at the time they are taking place, but afterward we think back on them and say, "That was fun" and wish they would happen again. After an enjoyable event we know that we have changed, that our self has grown: in some respect, we have become more complex as a result of it.
Experiences that give pleasure can also give enjoyment, but the two sensations are quite different. For instance, everybody takes pleasure in eating. To enjoy food, however, is more difficult. A gourmet enjoys eating, as does anyone who pays enough attention to a meal so as to discriminate the various sensations provided by it. As this example suggests, we can experience pleasure without any investment of psychic energy, whereas enjoyment happens only as a result of unusual investments of attention. A person can feel pleasure without any effort, if the appropriate centers in his brain are electrically stimulated, or as a result of the chemical stimulation of drugs. But it is impossible to enjoy a tennis game, a book, or a conversation unless attention is fully concentrated on the activity."
In short, enjoyment takes effort. You need to work a bit to achieve enjoyment. When it comes to food, may enjoy that gourmet meal you painstakingly cooked, presented, served and ate slowly and with intention, but you generally won't find enjoyment when you inhale a bag of potato chips.
The key here is that enjoyment is the key to happiness and that all forms of pleasure may not necessarily lead to happiness.